Page 1 of 2

For Those Interested In Learning

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 1:17 am
by babybubba

In case anyone has time, here's a front-page column in today's name removed that'll help anyone do better and continuously enjoy what they're doing for a change.
 
Link removed
 

Administrator note: We can not allow frequent posts linking to the same 3rd party site, which qualifies as advertising.  Please contact us if you wish to purchase advertising for a specific establishment and refrain from linking to these sites. Any discussion to be had can be had here without simply referring people to 3rd party sites. Thank you.

Re: For Those Interested In Learning

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 10:31 am
by Eduardo
I will read it thanks Bubba

Re: For Those Interested In Learning

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 3:30 pm
by faygo
 I read it and...

Re: For Those Interested In Learning

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 10:08 pm
by Webman
Babybubba, I should probably mention that you are the author of the article, for our visitors who are unaware  (although our regular readers have certainly not missed this point).
 
Then people can respond appropriately.
 
Note: We are now removing these links to 3rd party sites.  Please keep discussion of topics here without referring to 3rd party sites or publications.

Re: For Those Interested In Learning

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 7:51 am
by shadowman

 I read it and...
 
2) and 6) are reasonable advice, the rest of them you can toss in the garbage. They are typical Fa La La La La.... La la la la assertions with absolutely no basis in mathematics.

Re: For Those Interested In Learning

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 9:51 am
by pokeherguy
{2) and 6) are reasonable advice, the rest of them you can toss in the garbage. They are typical Fa La La La La.... La la la la assertions with absolutely no basis in mathematics.}
 
#1 seems to be fact as far as my playing has went over the years. I look at that rule as saying if you go 10 times 3 will be winning trips and 7 will be losers. I of corse went far more than 10 times but the 70% figure makes perfect sense to me.
 
#2 should be considered law. My gambling bankroll has nothing to do with my personal finances the two should not be mixed.
 
#3, I do it all the time if I'm ahead I do play the $5.00 VP machines a little but never play max. I've never won much money doing it but its still fun.
 
#4, I hate when the casinos do this crap it draws a crowd for sure but I could care less about getting a $7.00 patio grill or a Elvis gold coin. Everytime I've been to the casino and they were having a drawing for a car or giving away cash I've walked out a loser. I hate the whole atmosphere at the casino when they do these things, people standing around clogging the isles doing nothing more than taking up space. I can't count the amount of times I have had to ask people if they were'nt playing the VP machine I would like to and they get pissed because I took thier seat. The ones that are playing are playing at the $1.00 level and pushing off one credit at a time (pet peave of mine). Whats so funny about this is I play the $5.00 machines and never play max credits only difference is the $5.00 VP machines are located in the high dollar area and its like a ghost town there most of the time.
 
#5, all he's saying here is you never know.
 
#6, I have determination but do lack discipline and many times do exactly what he says not to do and I have'nt fared to bad. See rule #5, you never know. 

Re: For Those Interested In Learning

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 10:52 am
by MikeA
I just finished playing ten 100-coin sessions (simulated).  I start a new session when I lose the 100 coins or start a new session when I win 100 coins.  I did lose on 7 of those sessions.  The three times I at least doubled my 100 coin buyin for the session, I won 150 coins....all three times.  But then, I play down to the nearest 50 coin boundary.  Overall, I am "down" on these 10 sessions 300 coins out of 1000 coins placed at risk.
 
It's interesting to note that during this group of sessions, the lowest number of hands played was 39 and the most played in one session was 273.  The average was 97 or therebouts.
 
I was playing a high variance game in 9/6 DDB (not full pay).
 
During those sessions, only the last one included quads (9's).  The other two winning sessions were mostly won with Full Houses.
 
I'm not sure where I'm going with this, but it is not unlike many of my casino sessions.  It all depends on the quads.  If they are falling more frequently than in this 1000 hands, then I win, and if they don't, I lose.  But at my level of play, I can afford a 300 coin lose knowing that I'll be hitting a run of 300 coin wins for the same amount of play.  At least that seems to be my trend.
 
I would say that managing money for your sessions is critical.  It does not take Einstein to figure out that you should not be gambling with money not specifically set aside for that endevor.  Professionals would still fall within that criteria though they would obviously have a lot more assets dedicated to  their career goals!

Re: For Those Interested In Learning

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 12:33 pm
by rascal
One of the things that really gripes me and makes me wonder where we're headed as a society is when people buy groceries with their gambling money. Total irresponsibility!

Re: For Those Interested In Learning

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 12:34 pm
by royal flush
that post should be on jokes heading

Re: For Those Interested In Learning

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 12:41 pm
by rascal
It's no joke. Laugh about if you like, but wait until you meet someone so addicted to eating three square meals a day that he will actually raid his own family's gambling money...that's sick.