panic??
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1455
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 1:26 pm
Re: panic??
I google it, There are 2 incidents in Kansas and 1 in Texas.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:18 am
the nytimes, since early in the pandemic, has published a graph showing statistics for the country and each state. one of the graphs they publish shows recent status of each state, whether the disease is increasing, staying the same or decreasing. as of todays published report, there are only three (3) states, arizona, arkansas and s.dakota with increasing numbers. that means that 47 states have reducing or the same rate of cases. their other graph shows clearly how the curve is decreasing.
60k of the country's 87k deaths all occurred in just 7 states and mostly in nursing homes.
remember the 2 navy hospital ships that nyc and LA said they had to have. well, they have both departed, after treating less than a conbined total of 250 patients. remember cuomo saying he needed 40k ventilators, when it only needed a couple thousand. how much wasted taxpayer money just went to those hospital ships and ventilators. and, has anyone heard the governors of both states admit they were wrong?
and yet, the only stories the media publishes are ones that scare the shi$ out of people. they left wants this to continue, they want the power and feel the longer this lasts, the less likely trump is re-elected. they want people to be dependent on the government, even if it is a manufactured crisis.
60k of the country's 87k deaths all occurred in just 7 states and mostly in nursing homes.
remember the 2 navy hospital ships that nyc and LA said they had to have. well, they have both departed, after treating less than a conbined total of 250 patients. remember cuomo saying he needed 40k ventilators, when it only needed a couple thousand. how much wasted taxpayer money just went to those hospital ships and ventilators. and, has anyone heard the governors of both states admit they were wrong?
and yet, the only stories the media publishes are ones that scare the shi$ out of people. they left wants this to continue, they want the power and feel the longer this lasts, the less likely trump is re-elected. they want people to be dependent on the government, even if it is a manufactured crisis.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 10939
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:08 pm
Check out the DOA 3 Trillion Pelosi bill.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1443
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 1:21 pm
The leftist dems. added a trick to this bill that would allow illegal aliens to get stimulus cash!

-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:18 am
for a bill that is supposed to assist with economic recovery, her boondoggle mentions canabis more times than jobs.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:02 am
The news isn't saying this; and, of course, I don't know Nancy's thinking here; but just voting on this bill may benefit Democrats. The leftist-dems will get elected in their districts no matter what because they have no competition. The moderate dems, who do have competition in their districts, can point to their voting against their own party and being independent of Pelosi, and thus have a better chance of keeping their seats in the fall elections.
And of course everyone except the very leftists living in echo chambers would realize the bill had a zero chance of passing the Senate. So, it is really a low-risk move even though it will rile up the Republican-Libertarian base in districts where dems have essentially no chance anyway.
Along with this contrarian type of thinking, wouldn't it be interesting now if Trump pardoned Obama BEFORE any further investigations into Obama-Flynn-gate? In a way, this would "confirm" Obama's part in the domestic spying without any more investigation. Why else would Obama "need" a pardon? Trump could say that he was doing this to "heal" the political divide while preventing any defense on the part of dems in any forthcoming investigation. Much of the media will never cover a story of investigatory abuse in 2016-17 seriously anyway. And few have the patience to understand the nuances when the left side of the argument was that Flynn admitted to lying, whether or not this was simply a run-of-the-mill plea bargain to prevent further abuse. And Obama would then have a presidential pardon to adorn his historical resume.
And of course everyone except the very leftists living in echo chambers would realize the bill had a zero chance of passing the Senate. So, it is really a low-risk move even though it will rile up the Republican-Libertarian base in districts where dems have essentially no chance anyway.
Along with this contrarian type of thinking, wouldn't it be interesting now if Trump pardoned Obama BEFORE any further investigations into Obama-Flynn-gate? In a way, this would "confirm" Obama's part in the domestic spying without any more investigation. Why else would Obama "need" a pardon? Trump could say that he was doing this to "heal" the political divide while preventing any defense on the part of dems in any forthcoming investigation. Much of the media will never cover a story of investigatory abuse in 2016-17 seriously anyway. And few have the patience to understand the nuances when the left side of the argument was that Flynn admitted to lying, whether or not this was simply a run-of-the-mill plea bargain to prevent further abuse. And Obama would then have a presidential pardon to adorn his historical resume.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:18 am
new, the part about the obama pardon is brilliant. something the dems, who are smart/sneaky/mean/corrupt would think of doing.
remember pelosi said trump will always have the label of impeached. well, obama, would always have the label of pardoned.
what a dam smart idea, bravo!
remember pelosi said trump will always have the label of impeached. well, obama, would always have the label of pardoned.
what a dam smart idea, bravo!
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1443
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 1:21 pm
At the risk of repeating i would like to point out a fantastic article that explains very clearly the huge gulf that exists in the dem. party and why. I learned a great deal about true leftists and why even most liberals shun them.
I can't post a link so here is how i found it: Googled: It's hard to be a liberal,Mark Bauerlien. Then click on: It's hard to be a liberal-Epoch Times
I believe you will not find it to be a waste of time.
I can't post a link so here is how i found it: Googled: It's hard to be a liberal,Mark Bauerlien. Then click on: It's hard to be a liberal-Epoch Times
I believe you will not find it to be a waste of time.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1913
- Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2017 11:38 am
I was considering subscribing to Epoch , now I think I will ! Oh, the primary items that the lefty liberal dems want are VOTES and power !! how many ways can I make that clear to you Bob ?? , from the movie "what about bob ? "
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:18 am
according to today's edition of TAMPA BAY TIMES, in florida, 83% of deaths from chinese virus are folks 65 and older. less than 7% of all deaths were folks aged 54 and younger.
and, like many states, the stats can be misleading. if one had been diagnosed as positive for covid 19, and they died from an auto accident, it is likely the death was listed as covid.
83% of deaths are age 65 and older and the entire country is shut down, WHY?
and, like many states, the stats can be misleading. if one had been diagnosed as positive for covid 19, and they died from an auto accident, it is likely the death was listed as covid.
83% of deaths are age 65 and older and the entire country is shut down, WHY?