Merry Christmas everyone, except oej719!
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:02 am
Re: Merry Christmas everyone, except oej719!
Nice sentiment, Jim. Merry Christmas back to you! And have a great New Year. And may God bless us...every one.
-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:45 pm
Well johnny, at least you can't say I didn't give you a chance to try and become more sociable. Actually, you probably could say that since facts don't seem to get in your way. Do I need to be a bit more blunt to help you get it?
What you did do is confirm that you are a sadist for posting "all through the night, get it? that cannot help himself when it comes to falala, and your working out your frustations over him through me.
I don't care who you are. My post spoke as if you were someone different. You point out I am trying to make a case that you are a Christmas carol (get it? fa la la), but I clearly said, "There were no accusations or insults directed to your hero" [emphasis added]. That should be clear that I didn't accuse you of being him...unless you are your own hero.
Thats a lie. I just replied to a post of yours in the dreamcard thred that saw you acusing me of planning on doing 20 & 40 credit cashouts at diferent denominatons like pianoroland does and ultimatly i expect falala. You have done alousy job hiding your ache and agenda and a fine job of lying.
I've never suggested that you not post here. And r-dude was hardly ramrodded; he left of his own accord. And he could be back at any time as far as I know. Maybe he's not here now because he's completing his college degree so that his education can be consistent with the claims he made in one of his posts.
Looks to me like he was but i got sick of reading his and your psycotic posts. isnt it just like you to pick on your oppositions education. it must be a killer to you to know falalas if hes told you because he has the diplomas on the wall of his office and ill bet his is more impresive than yours. for your info i never went to college so pick all you want.
You probably shouldn't sit with your hero to try to emulate his claimed success at video poker, at least not with the single play strategy. It's a good bet you don't have the bankroll to play the strategy properly.
I dont have much of a bankroll but i do bring about $1500 every trip. At this point i have zero idea what it takes to do well using his methods.
I think you've seen the advice I'd give to someone who is dealing with a name-caller; I put it in my previous post to you. I'd patiently try to point out that you can't complain about name-callers when you yourself are one.
Theres out & out namecallers like oej and theres you, who do it through sly implications leaving an open window to jump through if you get called on it which i did and you cry & lie about not being one. ive seen your type on other forums, you try to give the impresion of how much better you are than others with your articulateness and fancy words. Your good with that computer protecting you arent you. im also sure thats why youd never want to meet up and discuss or debate falalas strategy because youll have nothing to hide behind then.
Your name-calling here is so numerous that I don't have to point out instances, but here's one: "all you are is another jealus poster who hes probably trounced on more than once."
if you take that as a namecall then youre acting like a girly man just like that mexican guy who said your nemesis made him cry. waa waa waa get a spine new. But i can see why you want "jealOus poster" to be a namecall, because all your posts do here and in that roland piano boring thred is and was show jealOusy over the guy. in fact the reason you stay up so late to respond to my comebacks with long posts is because the guys in your head so much and you just dont know what to do about it. Like i said, your scratching your annoying itch through me.
Where did I tell you how smart I thought I was? And if I thought I was smarter than I am, why would I be the one who is insecure?
Thats the part of your game here that you cannot hide.
You're right. I'm not that interesting. When I drink beer, I drink Miller Lite and I've never had Dos Equis. But again this is about video poker. And I have enough understanding to determine that much of what your hero writes, when he's not insulting others, is hokum. I don't care about his breath, his shoe size, his bank account history, his family, or even the acquaintances he brings to dinner. My interest on this forum is about video poker and I have little concern whether that is interesting to you.
My your touchy. You try to spit out one version of new 2 vp but your writing begs to difer. this guy is so far inside your head even a good spin session like the one youve created here wont do any good. i dont know what hokum is but he served Moose Drool dark beer. Did you ever think the reason he drinks good beer and you dont is because of the way you too play vid pok?
Maybe you know this, but one or two victories (or losses) in January will not give credence to whether his methods will improve your lifetime video poker winnings or reduce your losses. But if you cannot understand the math inherent in the game depending on different styles of play and you want to spend your time with him and report back, I'm sure that there might be forum members who want to read about it. I just won't be one of them waiting for your report with bated breath.
Are you kiding? no way you stay out of anything i say about if and what i learned and what went down. for your info ive studied and play the math way and i understand what its all about.
You made the mistake of referring to me as someone "...who hes probably trounced on more than once." Since a "trouncing" would indicate some sort of contest, I tried to correct you by saying my arguments here have been with others defending him...not with him. It appeared that you mistakenly thought that the others were him when they said here that they were not. There is a little irony here in that you are concerned that some people think you are him.
Theres your slick spin again. Read all your bluster in the piano thred. and you have the gall to cry about him writing you up in his column? What i saw was you asked for it and got it big time. in this thred just as in the dreamcard thred you show what a poor poker player youd make.
"I didn't think"
Now theres something that should show up more than once.
Why do you think that it would be impressive that someone who works with wrenches could be smart? Is that a condescending remark about what you think of working men? That sounds like something your hero would say.
your stuck again arent you. Happens every time you say what i say about you back to me. Your a dead giveaway when it comes to your condecending attitude.
Go ahead yourself and prove that they're accurate!
There you go again, you cant answer the tough question so you tell me to do it for you. do you ever tire of a machanic exposing a brainiac?
100% proof either way is fairly difficult without subpoena power and some hours of investigation. The next best thing is to determine what's most reasonable from the facts that are most available.
That looks like you stole that right from what he says about players like US on his website.
http://pokergrump.blogspot.com/2008_06_15_archive.html
i can give you a simple reply to all the (heres my word of the day spellers) bloviating in that article. i only understood one part, about how this writer doesnt believe falala has been winning. You talked about supenas and investigatons. On his site maybe if this writer read back a year or 2 hed have come across a big time chalenge in the gaming paper falala wrote for. i just went back and read it but i dont know how to post the link here, its from june of 2005 tho. ive never seen a gambler whos suposedly lying through his teeth as you guys and the blogspot guy claim put up that much cash and offer to show that much document and private info and then back it all up with a court apointed final decision binding arbitrater, if he didnt have nitpicking evidence of what he claimed. the profes gambler he chalenged backed out but he left it out for anyone else and from what ive folowed everyone else turned around too. Maybe you or that blog guy were one of them?
Back to my words: Anyway, why would anyone want to play by a method known to be inferior? And if you don't know that it is, that's ok. As they say, "A fool and his money are soon parted." But at least it will help the economy...maybe not you, but someone else. Best of luck, anyway. They say "even a blind squirrel gets that acorn once in a while," so maybe it will work out for you.
Like i said ill determine whats best for me once i finaly see what his method is. thats what an open mind does, not sit back and quate math and make selfserving claims yourself. You have zero idea if its inferior and you too should meet with him to discus it all.
Additionally, the paucity of misspellings and grammatical mistakes might cause most people to realize that the words were not from you.
As much as you say im innocent" youll never give up on that will you.
by the way RED is for CHRISTMAS. Any spelling errors in that one?
What you did do is confirm that you are a sadist for posting "all through the night, get it? that cannot help himself when it comes to falala, and your working out your frustations over him through me.
I don't care who you are. My post spoke as if you were someone different. You point out I am trying to make a case that you are a Christmas carol (get it? fa la la), but I clearly said, "There were no accusations or insults directed to your hero" [emphasis added]. That should be clear that I didn't accuse you of being him...unless you are your own hero.
Thats a lie. I just replied to a post of yours in the dreamcard thred that saw you acusing me of planning on doing 20 & 40 credit cashouts at diferent denominatons like pianoroland does and ultimatly i expect falala. You have done alousy job hiding your ache and agenda and a fine job of lying.
I've never suggested that you not post here. And r-dude was hardly ramrodded; he left of his own accord. And he could be back at any time as far as I know. Maybe he's not here now because he's completing his college degree so that his education can be consistent with the claims he made in one of his posts.
Looks to me like he was but i got sick of reading his and your psycotic posts. isnt it just like you to pick on your oppositions education. it must be a killer to you to know falalas if hes told you because he has the diplomas on the wall of his office and ill bet his is more impresive than yours. for your info i never went to college so pick all you want.
You probably shouldn't sit with your hero to try to emulate his claimed success at video poker, at least not with the single play strategy. It's a good bet you don't have the bankroll to play the strategy properly.
I dont have much of a bankroll but i do bring about $1500 every trip. At this point i have zero idea what it takes to do well using his methods.
I think you've seen the advice I'd give to someone who is dealing with a name-caller; I put it in my previous post to you. I'd patiently try to point out that you can't complain about name-callers when you yourself are one.
Theres out & out namecallers like oej and theres you, who do it through sly implications leaving an open window to jump through if you get called on it which i did and you cry & lie about not being one. ive seen your type on other forums, you try to give the impresion of how much better you are than others with your articulateness and fancy words. Your good with that computer protecting you arent you. im also sure thats why youd never want to meet up and discuss or debate falalas strategy because youll have nothing to hide behind then.
Your name-calling here is so numerous that I don't have to point out instances, but here's one: "all you are is another jealus poster who hes probably trounced on more than once."
if you take that as a namecall then youre acting like a girly man just like that mexican guy who said your nemesis made him cry. waa waa waa get a spine new. But i can see why you want "jealOus poster" to be a namecall, because all your posts do here and in that roland piano boring thred is and was show jealOusy over the guy. in fact the reason you stay up so late to respond to my comebacks with long posts is because the guys in your head so much and you just dont know what to do about it. Like i said, your scratching your annoying itch through me.
Where did I tell you how smart I thought I was? And if I thought I was smarter than I am, why would I be the one who is insecure?
Thats the part of your game here that you cannot hide.
You're right. I'm not that interesting. When I drink beer, I drink Miller Lite and I've never had Dos Equis. But again this is about video poker. And I have enough understanding to determine that much of what your hero writes, when he's not insulting others, is hokum. I don't care about his breath, his shoe size, his bank account history, his family, or even the acquaintances he brings to dinner. My interest on this forum is about video poker and I have little concern whether that is interesting to you.
My your touchy. You try to spit out one version of new 2 vp but your writing begs to difer. this guy is so far inside your head even a good spin session like the one youve created here wont do any good. i dont know what hokum is but he served Moose Drool dark beer. Did you ever think the reason he drinks good beer and you dont is because of the way you too play vid pok?
Maybe you know this, but one or two victories (or losses) in January will not give credence to whether his methods will improve your lifetime video poker winnings or reduce your losses. But if you cannot understand the math inherent in the game depending on different styles of play and you want to spend your time with him and report back, I'm sure that there might be forum members who want to read about it. I just won't be one of them waiting for your report with bated breath.
Are you kiding? no way you stay out of anything i say about if and what i learned and what went down. for your info ive studied and play the math way and i understand what its all about.
You made the mistake of referring to me as someone "...who hes probably trounced on more than once." Since a "trouncing" would indicate some sort of contest, I tried to correct you by saying my arguments here have been with others defending him...not with him. It appeared that you mistakenly thought that the others were him when they said here that they were not. There is a little irony here in that you are concerned that some people think you are him.
Theres your slick spin again. Read all your bluster in the piano thred. and you have the gall to cry about him writing you up in his column? What i saw was you asked for it and got it big time. in this thred just as in the dreamcard thred you show what a poor poker player youd make.
"I didn't think"
Now theres something that should show up more than once.
Why do you think that it would be impressive that someone who works with wrenches could be smart? Is that a condescending remark about what you think of working men? That sounds like something your hero would say.
your stuck again arent you. Happens every time you say what i say about you back to me. Your a dead giveaway when it comes to your condecending attitude.
Go ahead yourself and prove that they're accurate!
There you go again, you cant answer the tough question so you tell me to do it for you. do you ever tire of a machanic exposing a brainiac?
100% proof either way is fairly difficult without subpoena power and some hours of investigation. The next best thing is to determine what's most reasonable from the facts that are most available.
That looks like you stole that right from what he says about players like US on his website.
http://pokergrump.blogspot.com/2008_06_15_archive.html
i can give you a simple reply to all the (heres my word of the day spellers) bloviating in that article. i only understood one part, about how this writer doesnt believe falala has been winning. You talked about supenas and investigatons. On his site maybe if this writer read back a year or 2 hed have come across a big time chalenge in the gaming paper falala wrote for. i just went back and read it but i dont know how to post the link here, its from june of 2005 tho. ive never seen a gambler whos suposedly lying through his teeth as you guys and the blogspot guy claim put up that much cash and offer to show that much document and private info and then back it all up with a court apointed final decision binding arbitrater, if he didnt have nitpicking evidence of what he claimed. the profes gambler he chalenged backed out but he left it out for anyone else and from what ive folowed everyone else turned around too. Maybe you or that blog guy were one of them?
Back to my words: Anyway, why would anyone want to play by a method known to be inferior? And if you don't know that it is, that's ok. As they say, "A fool and his money are soon parted." But at least it will help the economy...maybe not you, but someone else. Best of luck, anyway. They say "even a blind squirrel gets that acorn once in a while," so maybe it will work out for you.
Like i said ill determine whats best for me once i finaly see what his method is. thats what an open mind does, not sit back and quate math and make selfserving claims yourself. You have zero idea if its inferior and you too should meet with him to discus it all.
Additionally, the paucity of misspellings and grammatical mistakes might cause most people to realize that the words were not from you.
As much as you say im innocent" youll never give up on that will you.
by the way RED is for CHRISTMAS. Any spelling errors in that one?
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:02 am
What you did do is confirm that you are a
sadist for posting "all through the night, get it? that cannot help
himself when it comes to falala, and your working out your frustations
over him through me. I think you meant "masochist."
isnt it just like you to pick on
your oppositions education. I wasn't picking on his education. I was picking on his lying about his education. (I thought you read through the posts. You get touchy every time I wonder how you have so much understanding of your hero and what was said here.) R-dude is like your hero; he believed he could bolster his credibility by claiming to be degreed in business law and accounting. Trouble was he was tricked into contradicting the fact that he had only listed "some college" rather than a degree on the same Web site that he wanted to impress us with how many women he could be photographed with. You didn't get that, huh? Too bad, it was pretty funny.it must be a killer to you to know falalas
if hes told you because he has the diplomas on the wall of his office
It's your hero who is obsessed with education and in particular dipomas
and possibly you from your fawning over his. What do you mean IF I
knew your hero's education? He brags about it every chance he gets as
if it proves his shams to be true. I also know that not knowing my
education bothers him since he's openly speculated about it in
newsletters. I'm much more impressed with the abilities that someone
has developed and the knowledge that they demonstrate than their education or what they started with.ill bet his is more impresive than yours.
You'd lose...and lose badly. I don't state my education here because it is unimportant in determining who's right and who's wrong about video poker strategy.
I dont have much of a bankroll but i do
bring about $1500 every trip.I wasn't criticizing you or your bankroll. I was just extrapolating that you wouldn't be better than all the thousands and thousands of people your hero has "helped" over the years, since he has stated, "every player I've taught [this play strategy] to has never utilized the bankroll I saved in order to play the strategy properly" [emphasis added]. Unless you're pretty special, your hero thinks you won't be able to play his strategy properly. Pretty big caveat on his part, wouldn't you say?At this point i have zero idea what it
takes to do well using his methods.That's surprising given all you say that you know from reading the posts on this forum, specifically the ones about your hero.
if you take that as a namecall then youre
acting like a girly man just like that mexican guy who said your
nemesis made him cry. waa waa waa get a spine new. This one is priceless! Recall that you denied ever name-calling here on the forum and challenged me to find even one place where that had occurred. I believe your words that I was responding to were "one thing i have not done is namecalling...Tough question alert, show me where ive namecalled." And in criticizing my response and continuing to deny that you have, you wrote what's in the box above. I admit that I put the bold font in your quote, not you. Now, I'm not hurt by it, nor do I care what you call me. You were the one so enraged and incensed by what others wrote.Postscript: You misused the word "nemesis" above.
Johnny, Everything that I say seems to cause you either to misinterpret the words, not believe them, or get your feelings so hurt that you need to lash out. You see oej's words as hurtful yet you cannot seem to be sufficiently introspective to see how the words of your hero and you hurt others like Eduardo. You attempt to psychoanalyze others without being able to turn the scope on yourself. You would rather instigate a longer column than try to reach agreement, even if the agreement is just to disagree civilly.Nevertheless, in the spirit of Christmas eve, I'll not respond to the other parts of your latest outburst and give you a Christmas present. I'm fairly certain that you'll misunderstand the difference between choosing not to respond and not being able to respond. It's really simple; the same difference as there is between "won't" and "can't."I believe I've given enough samples in my posts to indicate to most that I could if I chose to.I'm not sure you deserve it but I'll charitably try to save you the time and the angst of trying to find a new way to say that I'm being unfair or applying "slick spin" to the situation. I'll just stipulate that you disagree with whatever I say and that I haven't answered the questions to your satisfaction. I started out making a few tongue-in-cheek comments and you chose to escalate it into a nuclear war of words.Your Christmas present? You will get your reward in a few days when your hero puts out a new e-letter or column and adjudges that you blasted me out of the water. As a matter of fact, I guarantee that he will do so! Now, that gives him quite a dilemma because most people here know he has so little new to write about that he pounces on every opportunity to trash someone from this forum.But if he does...then he'll prove me right! But I'm betting he won't be able to help himself. After all, his biased description will hardly be objective. That's another guarantee!Merry Christmas, everyone! That greeting is all-inclusive, even to name-callers!
-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:45 pm
[/QUOTE] I think you meant "masochist."
Really doesnt matter does it. its Christmas eve and your sitting at your computer for hours on end waiting to see how ill separate you from your arogance this time. Ever hear of a family? that must be one of the reasons why you disdain falala so much, his good family. i envy him for that but at the same time i know im not as fortunate because im married a 2nd time and have a son but neither are home tonight right now.
I wasn't picking on his education. I was picking on his lying about his education. (I thought you read through the posts. You get touchy every time I wonder how you have so much understanding of your hero and what was said here.) R-dude is like your hero; he believed he could bolster his credibility by claiming to be degreed in business law and accounting. Trouble was he was tricked into contradicting the fact that he had only listed "some college" rather than a degree on the same Web site that he wanted to impress us with how many women he could be photographed with. You didn't get that, huh? Too bad, it was pretty funny.
i didnt know that but it holds no importance. Lying is common among the posse and you never complain about or expose that do you.
It's your hero who is obsessed with education and in particular dipomas and possibly you from your fawning over his. What do you mean IF I knew your hero's education? He brags about it every chance he gets as if it proves his shams to be true. I also know that not knowing my education bothers him since he's openly speculated about it in newsletters.
You mean youve come out of your hiding place and told falala who you are? then why do you go alias here, what else are you hiding besides an arogant personailty thats not suppose to be exposed? From what ive read here your APPEAR to be educated but who knows. Home on a lonly computer on Christmas eve doesnt exactly sound too educated to me.
ill bet his is more impresive than yours. You'd lose...and lose badly. I don't state my education here because it is unimportant in determining who's right and who's wrong about video poker strategy.
i saw his and all you do is claim to have better. That fits you to a t.
I wasn't criticizing you or your bankroll. I was just extrapolating that you wouldn't be better than all the thousands and thousands of people your hero has "helped" over the years, since he has stated, "every player I've taught [this play strategy] to has never utilized the bankroll I saved in order to play the strategy properly" [emphasis added]. Unless you're pretty special, your hero thinks you won't be able to play his strategy properly. Pretty big caveat on his part, wouldn't you say?
You talk a big game for some one whos afraid to meet him and see what hes all about. You make up that you know him from the internet but with all that intelect you should know a whole lot better then that.
At this point i have zero idea what it takes to do well using his methods.That's surprising given all you say that you know from reading the posts on this forum, specifically the ones about your hero.
i never said i paid atention to his play method all i stated was i didnt care about it until i meet with him to have it explained. im not real good with numbers, have you seen that yet?but i can play cards. and stop getting hot under the coller by using the hero reference all the time.
This one is priceless! Recall that you denied ever name-calling here on the forum and challenged me to find even one place where that had occurred. I believe your words that I was responding to were "one thing i have not done is namecalling...Tough question alert, show me where ive namecalled." And in criticizing my response and continuing to deny that you have, you wrote what's in the box above.
your making a fool of yourself and your proclaimed education superiority. Telling someone theyre acting like a girly man is not at all calling someone that. im starting to believe your a little concerned about your manlihood right now so it making you lose it.
Johnny, Everything that I say seems to cause you either to misinterpret the words, not believe them, or get your feelings so hurt that you need to lash out. You see oej's words as hurtful yet you cannot seem to be sufficiently introspective to see how the words of your hero and you hurt others like Eduardo. You attempt to psychoanalyze others without being able to turn the scope on yourself. You would rather instigate a longer column than try to reach agreement, even if the agreement is just to disagree civilly.
Poor eduardo and now poor you. One cried out loud and the other wimpers under his breath. i respect the mexican guy a whole lot more because hes not being weasily about his sensitivity.
Nevertheless, in the spirit of Christmas eve, I'll not respond to the other parts of your latest outburst and give you a Christmas present. I'm fairly certain that you'll misunderstand the difference between choosing not to respond and not being able to respond. It's really simple; the same difference as there is between "won't" and "can't."
How weird is that? just admit you have no ability to just let anything go when your losing a match or just cant come up with the right words to make yourself sound sensable.
I'm not sure you deserve it but I'll charitably try to save you the time and the angst of trying to find a new way to say that I'm being unfair or applying "slick spin" to the situation. I'll just stipulate that you disagree with whatever I say and that I haven't answered the questions to your satisfaction. I started out making a few tongue-in-cheek comments and you chose to escalate it into a nuclear war of words.
Now you turn to the bulls***. A war of words? your the one with all the fancy words and your winning that. but im disarming everything else about you and there is plenty to strip you of that only a dying mother could love.
Your Christmas present? You will get your reward in a few days when your hero puts out a new e-letter or column and adjudges that you blasted me out of the water. As a matter of fact, I guarantee that he will do so! Now, that gives him quite a dilemma because most people here know he has so little new to write about that he pounces on every opportunity to trash someone from this forum.
Who tf cares? besides like he doesnt have every reason to trash people here for what they post knowing he wont respond here. That is what i meant when i said it is quite cowardly. Besides its not like your the toughest guy in the world to shake up. You constantly say all these undermining things about him in your curtsie cute way and you expect not to be slaped upside the head? Wise up mr. intellect.
But if he does...then he'll prove me right! But I'm betting he won't be able to help himself. After all, his biased description will hardly be objective. That's another guarantee!
What if he doesnt wont you feel stupid, oh no you wont because youll start spinning it out of control again.
Merry Christmas, everyone! That greeting is all-inclusive, even to name-callers!
Did you just call me a name-caller?
Really doesnt matter does it. its Christmas eve and your sitting at your computer for hours on end waiting to see how ill separate you from your arogance this time. Ever hear of a family? that must be one of the reasons why you disdain falala so much, his good family. i envy him for that but at the same time i know im not as fortunate because im married a 2nd time and have a son but neither are home tonight right now.
I wasn't picking on his education. I was picking on his lying about his education. (I thought you read through the posts. You get touchy every time I wonder how you have so much understanding of your hero and what was said here.) R-dude is like your hero; he believed he could bolster his credibility by claiming to be degreed in business law and accounting. Trouble was he was tricked into contradicting the fact that he had only listed "some college" rather than a degree on the same Web site that he wanted to impress us with how many women he could be photographed with. You didn't get that, huh? Too bad, it was pretty funny.
i didnt know that but it holds no importance. Lying is common among the posse and you never complain about or expose that do you.
It's your hero who is obsessed with education and in particular dipomas and possibly you from your fawning over his. What do you mean IF I knew your hero's education? He brags about it every chance he gets as if it proves his shams to be true. I also know that not knowing my education bothers him since he's openly speculated about it in newsletters.
You mean youve come out of your hiding place and told falala who you are? then why do you go alias here, what else are you hiding besides an arogant personailty thats not suppose to be exposed? From what ive read here your APPEAR to be educated but who knows. Home on a lonly computer on Christmas eve doesnt exactly sound too educated to me.
ill bet his is more impresive than yours. You'd lose...and lose badly. I don't state my education here because it is unimportant in determining who's right and who's wrong about video poker strategy.
i saw his and all you do is claim to have better. That fits you to a t.
I wasn't criticizing you or your bankroll. I was just extrapolating that you wouldn't be better than all the thousands and thousands of people your hero has "helped" over the years, since he has stated, "every player I've taught [this play strategy] to has never utilized the bankroll I saved in order to play the strategy properly" [emphasis added]. Unless you're pretty special, your hero thinks you won't be able to play his strategy properly. Pretty big caveat on his part, wouldn't you say?
You talk a big game for some one whos afraid to meet him and see what hes all about. You make up that you know him from the internet but with all that intelect you should know a whole lot better then that.
At this point i have zero idea what it takes to do well using his methods.That's surprising given all you say that you know from reading the posts on this forum, specifically the ones about your hero.
i never said i paid atention to his play method all i stated was i didnt care about it until i meet with him to have it explained. im not real good with numbers, have you seen that yet?but i can play cards. and stop getting hot under the coller by using the hero reference all the time.
This one is priceless! Recall that you denied ever name-calling here on the forum and challenged me to find even one place where that had occurred. I believe your words that I was responding to were "one thing i have not done is namecalling...Tough question alert, show me where ive namecalled." And in criticizing my response and continuing to deny that you have, you wrote what's in the box above.
your making a fool of yourself and your proclaimed education superiority. Telling someone theyre acting like a girly man is not at all calling someone that. im starting to believe your a little concerned about your manlihood right now so it making you lose it.
Johnny, Everything that I say seems to cause you either to misinterpret the words, not believe them, or get your feelings so hurt that you need to lash out. You see oej's words as hurtful yet you cannot seem to be sufficiently introspective to see how the words of your hero and you hurt others like Eduardo. You attempt to psychoanalyze others without being able to turn the scope on yourself. You would rather instigate a longer column than try to reach agreement, even if the agreement is just to disagree civilly.
Poor eduardo and now poor you. One cried out loud and the other wimpers under his breath. i respect the mexican guy a whole lot more because hes not being weasily about his sensitivity.
Nevertheless, in the spirit of Christmas eve, I'll not respond to the other parts of your latest outburst and give you a Christmas present. I'm fairly certain that you'll misunderstand the difference between choosing not to respond and not being able to respond. It's really simple; the same difference as there is between "won't" and "can't."
How weird is that? just admit you have no ability to just let anything go when your losing a match or just cant come up with the right words to make yourself sound sensable.
I'm not sure you deserve it but I'll charitably try to save you the time and the angst of trying to find a new way to say that I'm being unfair or applying "slick spin" to the situation. I'll just stipulate that you disagree with whatever I say and that I haven't answered the questions to your satisfaction. I started out making a few tongue-in-cheek comments and you chose to escalate it into a nuclear war of words.
Now you turn to the bulls***. A war of words? your the one with all the fancy words and your winning that. but im disarming everything else about you and there is plenty to strip you of that only a dying mother could love.
Your Christmas present? You will get your reward in a few days when your hero puts out a new e-letter or column and adjudges that you blasted me out of the water. As a matter of fact, I guarantee that he will do so! Now, that gives him quite a dilemma because most people here know he has so little new to write about that he pounces on every opportunity to trash someone from this forum.
Who tf cares? besides like he doesnt have every reason to trash people here for what they post knowing he wont respond here. That is what i meant when i said it is quite cowardly. Besides its not like your the toughest guy in the world to shake up. You constantly say all these undermining things about him in your curtsie cute way and you expect not to be slaped upside the head? Wise up mr. intellect.
But if he does...then he'll prove me right! But I'm betting he won't be able to help himself. After all, his biased description will hardly be objective. That's another guarantee!
What if he doesnt wont you feel stupid, oh no you wont because youll start spinning it out of control again.
Merry Christmas, everyone! That greeting is all-inclusive, even to name-callers!
Did you just call me a name-caller?
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:02 am
I get it. You don't agree. Merry Christmas. (but a lot of that is funny, I don't care who you are!)
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 8642
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am
johnnylong I merely pointed out that you didn't say in your original post that Fa la la did the wiring for the television, then you got a bit personal with me. I have not really taken a side with anyone since you started posting here but if history is any indicator then I would allign with: oej, cd, shadowman, eduardo, 'da Cat, and New2vp.
As for the educational background of some of the people you have traded posts with I would take a (educated) guess and say that New2vp and Shadowman are the most learned. There are several more of us who are probably a notch below these guys or even somewhat equal in terms of degrees earned. I, for one, have two bachelors and two masters degrees because in my field continuing education is a good thing. Also just because I have achieved success in the classroom doesn't mean I haven't gotten my hands dirty either. In my line of work I have seen things that would make many people, including you, throw up the contents of their stomach and probably put them in to shock as well. But getting back to New2vp, he was doing his level best trying to educate you and show you why Fa la la's system is flawed. Other people here have also alerted you to the fact that Fa la la also has a habit of changing system's after one is determined to be flawed. I would guess without looking back through the last nine pages of posts these people would have probably included: oej, 'da Cat, Eduardo, Shadowman and New2vp. I personally equate Fa la la's revolving door of systems to a false prophet telling of the world's impending doom and when the date comes and goes and the Earth is still intact this same false prophet will have some reason why the Earth did not get burned up by the sun and they will merely give a new date when the world will end. Now just because you slammed me I will end this post with the below:
by the way RED is for CHRISTMAS. Any spelling errors in that one?
impresive should be IMPRESSIVE
impresion should be IMPRESSION
articulateness I have no idea what context this word even fits
your should be YOU'RE
youd should be YOU'D
thred should be THREAD
your see above
difer should be DIFFER
condecending should be CONDESCENDING
supenas should be SUBPOENA
machanic should be MECHANIC
And finally: you said to look back a year or 2 for an article then you said you thought it was 2005. I know looking back a year or two would mean going back to 2008 or 2007. Subtract either 1 or 2 from 2009 and you would arrive at this figure. It is my sincerest hope that you do not do the billing at whatever shop you performance tune mustangs.
Have you had the opportunity to judge any Hawiian Tropic bikini contests?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:34 am
Ted,
Did you catch my post a few pages back with some of the spelling errors? I think I stopped looking after posting 26 of them.... and that is just spelling. his grammar is a whole different story... good grief!
Did you catch my post a few pages back with some of the spelling errors? I think I stopped looking after posting 26 of them.... and that is just spelling. his grammar is a whole different story... good grief!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:34 am
[QUOTE=vidopoker]
-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:45 pm
I get it. You don't agree. Merry Christmas.
(but a lot of that is funny, I don't care who you are!)
That musta hurt.
(but a lot of that is funny, I don't care who you are!)
That musta hurt.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 8642
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:29 am
I found these just in the second post from the top of page 10 New2vp. Yes I think correct grammar is above the pay grade; between all the to's, too's two's and your, you're and yore that would really raise the tally. Did we forget to mention punctuation?
Mary Christmas New2vp.
Mary Christmas New2vp.