5,600 RF- DW Pay Table
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 2693
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:35 pm
5,600 RF- DW Pay Table
In our recent travels I accidentally came across this pay table. I had just switched to DW and a few hands later I caught a RF. The extra large payout confused me so I re-checked the pay table. Yahoo! Luckily, I caught another RF a few minutes later. My analysis showed around 99.68% return instead of 98%. I checked the other games and denominations but they were all 4K.
[/IMG]
[/IMG]
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3198
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:00 pm
Nice 'scouting', LL.
BTY, per VPW, I show 99.215% for this paytable, without the STP feature. Where was this 'magic' machine?
BTY, per VPW, I show 99.215% for this paytable, without the STP feature. Where was this 'magic' machine?
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:42 pm
I also get 99.68% return without the stp extras.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3198
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:00 pm
I also get 99.68% return without the stp extras.
My bad. Had Str FL put in VPW wrong - couldn't see the end column on the pic, and guessed wrong. 99.679%
My bad. Had Str FL put in VPW wrong - couldn't see the end column on the pic, and guessed wrong. 99.679%
-
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:56 pm
You hit 2 RFs within several minutes of each other? That sounds
Luckier than finding a paytable error:)
Luckier than finding a paytable error:)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:15 am
I've been playing a DW game (but with 4000 for the royal) where the paytable is identical to this, except the straight flush pays 60 and 5 OAK pays 80. 10¢ denomination.It's not STP but another "multiplier" game.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:42 pm
I've been playing a DW game (but with 4000 for the royal) where the paytable is identical to this, except the straight flush pays 60 and 5 OAK pays 80. 10¢ denomination.
It's not STP but another "multiplier" game.
The game you mentioned is referred to as NSUD and is one of the better paying deuces games around at 99.7%. Add in the multipliers and it should be a little better than that.
It's not STP but another "multiplier" game.
The game you mentioned is referred to as NSUD and is one of the better paying deuces games around at 99.7%. Add in the multipliers and it should be a little better than that.
-
- VP Veteran
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:59 pm
[QUOTE=mammajamma]I've been playing a DW game (but with 4000 for the royal) where the paytable is identical to this, except the straight flush pays 60 and 5 OAK pays 80. 10¢ denomination.
It's not STP but another "multiplier" game.
The game you mentioned is referred to as NSUD and is one of the better paying deuces games around at 99.7%. Add in the multipliers and it should be a little better than that.[/QUOTE]
In NSUD (99.73% return), the straight flush pays 50 for 5 coins, not 60. I've never seen a deuces wild game pay 60 for a straight flush. There is a poor deuces wild pay table which pays 65 for the straight flush, but only returns 15 for the full house and 10 for a flush (96.77% return).
It's not STP but another "multiplier" game.
The game you mentioned is referred to as NSUD and is one of the better paying deuces games around at 99.7%. Add in the multipliers and it should be a little better than that.[/QUOTE]
In NSUD (99.73% return), the straight flush pays 50 for 5 coins, not 60. I've never seen a deuces wild game pay 60 for a straight flush. There is a poor deuces wild pay table which pays 65 for the straight flush, but only returns 15 for the full house and 10 for a flush (96.77% return).
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:42 pm
In NSUD (99.73% return), the straight flush pays 50 for 5 coins, not 60. I've never seen a deuces wild game pay 60 for a straight flush. There is a poor deuces wild pay table which pays 65 for the straight flush, but only returns 15 for the full house and 10 for a flush (96.77% return).
I figured it was a typo since I've never seen this pay table before either.
I figured it was a typo since I've never seen this pay table before either.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:15 am
NOT A TYPObeen playing this hidden gem for over 3 yearsI'll try to get a snapshot of the paytable next time