Gold Exclusive
My Favorites
I emailed a suggestion to Leading Edge Design to combine Multi-Strike Poker with Spin Poker. They say they discussed the idea with their developers and found one possible snag:Adhering to the "only winning hands advance" rule, players would be able to see the hands on unlit paylines and might find it too disappointing if a high-ranking hand just happens to line up on a dark payline. They say if their research finds it's something players can live with, they might go ahead and look further into making the game a reality.How do you feel about it? Would you pay more attention to your winning hands and not fret too much about the inevitable "coulda been a winner" hands? Or would you cash out and give up after a few missed Four of a Kinds?Personally, I wouldn't mind. I'm more likely to concentrate on the task at hand and not cry over spilled Royal Flushes.How about YOU?
Multi-Strike Spin Poker: What say YOU?
-
JoeEkaitis
- Forum Rookie
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:42 am
-
bigboy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:03 pm
I emailed a suggestion to Leading Edge Design to combine Multi-Strike Poker with Spin Poker. They say they discussed the idea with their developers and found one possible snag:
Adhering to the "only winning hands advance" rule, players would be able to see the hands on unlit paylines and might find it too disappointing if a high-ranking hand just happens to line up on a dark payline. They say if their research finds it's something players can live with, they might go ahead and look further into making the game a reality.
How do you feel about it? Would you pay more attention to your winning hands and not fret too much about the inevitable "coulda been a winner" hands? Or would you cash out and give up after a few missed Four of a Kinds?
Personally, I wouldn't mind. I'm more likely to concentrate on the task at hand and not cry over spilled Royal Flushes.
How about YOU?
I'd say there comes a point of too much(over-kill). IMO, this game would fall under that category. Although, if they did bring it out, you might make some good money selling aspirin to the bewildered players at the machines.
Adhering to the "only winning hands advance" rule, players would be able to see the hands on unlit paylines and might find it too disappointing if a high-ranking hand just happens to line up on a dark payline. They say if their research finds it's something players can live with, they might go ahead and look further into making the game a reality.
How do you feel about it? Would you pay more attention to your winning hands and not fret too much about the inevitable "coulda been a winner" hands? Or would you cash out and give up after a few missed Four of a Kinds?
Personally, I wouldn't mind. I'm more likely to concentrate on the task at hand and not cry over spilled Royal Flushes.
How about YOU?
I'd say there comes a point of too much(over-kill). IMO, this game would fall under that category. Although, if they did bring it out, you might make some good money selling aspirin to the bewildered players at the machines.
-
chuck arl
- Senior Member
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:39 am
With 9 lines times 4 levels on multi-strike, and let's throw in super times pay to boot. It looks like this game has the potential to gobble more money than a SUV gobbles gasoline. If you win, it can be sweet.---CWA---
-
spxChrome
- VP Veteran
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:21 pm
With 9 lines times 4 levels on multi-strike, and let's throw in super times pay to boot. It looks like this game has the potential to gobble more money than a SUV gobbles gasoline. If you win, it can be sweet.---CWA---
Big IF, I mean aren't you suppose to say when... maybe thats my problem
Big IF, I mean aren't you suppose to say when... maybe thats my problem
