Worst cold streak
-
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:41 pm
Re: Worst cold streak
That I am actually aware of it is 21, but it could be 23.
-
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:41 pm
Oh also, about 300 hours + for a royal, and still counting!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:10 pm
I attempted to get a count at the casino this past weekend. I earned 5,000 base points. $10 dollars in equals one base point on video poker. I was playing dollars so I had 10,000 plays without a royal. I am due! Sooner or later it will pop up again.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3050
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:00 pm
10,000 hands without a royal could hardly be termed a cold streak!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:10 pm
Your right onemoretry that 10,000 hands is not a cold streak by itself but three years of no royals playing 10,000 hands four times a month is! I figure that comes out to be in the neighborhood of 40,000 times 36 months.
-
- VP Veteran
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:21 pm
Your right onemoretry that 10,000 hands is not a cold streak by itself but three years of no royals playing 10,000 hands four times a month is! I figure that comes out to be in the neighborhood of 40,000 times 36 months.
Here is what you do, play .01 x 100 play to get the monkey off your back. Then you will be back on track.
Either that or you will be one of those that hits a Royal while waiting to get paid on a Royal
Here is what you do, play .01 x 100 play to get the monkey off your back. Then you will be back on track.
Either that or you will be one of those that hits a Royal while waiting to get paid on a Royal
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3050
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:00 pm
Your right onemoretry that 10,000 hands is not a cold streak by itself but three years of no royals playing 10,000 hands four times a month is! I figure that comes out to be in the neighborhood of 40,000 times 36 months.
That works out to 1.44 million hands without a royal. Either you're the unluckiest person alive, or your estimate of the number of hands is inflated. The probability of playing that many consecutive hands without a royal is so low that my calculator can't handle it.
The probability of going 750,000 consecutive hands without a royal is about 0.000001%.
That works out to 1.44 million hands without a royal. Either you're the unluckiest person alive, or your estimate of the number of hands is inflated. The probability of playing that many consecutive hands without a royal is so low that my calculator can't handle it.
The probability of going 750,000 consecutive hands without a royal is about 0.000001%.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:02 am
The probability of going 750,000 consecutive hands without a royal is about 0.000001%.So, you're telling me there's a chance...yeah!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:10 pm
I knew I was on a cold streak! Now I find out I am the most unlucky person alive--now that is a bad cold streak!
Today went to play. I earned 1,000 base points. Now I played quarters today so had five hands to earn a base point. So had 5,000 hands played and never came close to a royal. I did get four of a kind playing double double bonus three times. It cost me $100 to play today.
Today went to play. I earned 1,000 base points. Now I played quarters today so had five hands to earn a base point. So had 5,000 hands played and never came close to a royal. I did get four of a kind playing double double bonus three times. It cost me $100 to play today.
-
- Video Poker Master
- Posts: 3587
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:42 pm
Today went to play. I earned 1,000 base points. Now I played quarters today so had five hands to earn a base point.
It takes $6.25 to earn a base point? Seems like a strange amount. Where I play it takes $5. For most casinos in Vegas it takes $1.